data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c328/3c3282ee6a3c89d11e25b9fba09dd0beb64213c3" alt=""
Notably, the Times' surging competitor -- The Wall Street Journal -- failed to win a single prize.
The NYT won for explanatory reporting and for national reporting. Plus, the Times's Sunday magazine tied for the award in investigative reporting with with the Philadelphia Daily News. The magazine's work was in collaboration with ProPublica -- a new, non-profit website devoted to investigative journalism. (So, in fact, maybe the NYT won just 2.5 Pulitzers.)
In a new post, the New York Observer says: The WSJ, which was once a Pulitzer-hoarder under former top editor Paul Steiger, "once again goes home empty-handed." The paper has not won an award since April 2007, and this brings the Journal's Pulitzer count in the Rupert Murdoch era to a grand total of zero, the Observer says.
Related: the complete list of 2010 winners. Plus, the WSJ's account of the awards
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please keep comments focused squarely on topics related to News Corp. and its affiliates.